Search Results
7 articles found. Page 1 of 1. | Advanced Search
7 articles found. Page 1 of 1.
Top categories
-
Artist
-
Piece type
-
Publication
-
Writer
Advanced Search
Top categories
-
Artist
-
Piece type
-
Publication
-
Writer
The Rolling Stones: Some Girls
Review by Charles Shaar Murray, NME, 10 June 1978
THESE LAST two or three years, the Stones haven't really been that important to rock and roll. ...
The Rolling Stones: Some Girls
Review by Kris Needs, ZigZag, July 1978
AH, THE NEW Stones album. For me the most feverishly-anticipated event between the first album in 1963 and Black and Blue two years ago was ...
The Rolling Stones: Some Girls
Review by Peter Silverton, Sounds, 10 June 1978
WHICHEVER WAY you look at it, this is an important album of the first order. Important primarily because it's the first album (excluding Love You ...
The Rolling Stones: Stones Still Hungry After All These Years
Review by Geoffrey Himes, Unicorn Times, 1 July 1978
THE ROLLING STONES first crawled into our collective hearts as a teenage working class street punk band. And now, here are Keith Richard and Mick ...
The Rolling Stones: Dirty Work
Review by Charles Shaar Murray, NME, 29 March 1986
IN THE 1970s, The Rolling Stones were a distinctly unlovely proposition: fronted by a jet-setter and a junkie and churning out a series of tedious ...
The Rolling Stones: Emotional Rescue (Rolling Stones)****
Review by Peter Silverton, Sounds, 28 June 1980
"IMAGE IS so important to rock stars. Mick Jagger is the rock star with the longest running image. He's the one all the young white ...
The Rolling Stones: Rolling Stones: Live Licks
Review by Terry Staunton, Record Collector, January 2005
THEIR SEVENTH concert record, if you’re counting ...
Advanced Search
back to LIBRARY